Wrap the judge prompt and two docstrings past the 120-col convention;
record three implementation rulings in the v0.9 spec (exploration read
outlets, round-based sampling, findings carrying all ratings).
report, markdown and analysis each repeated the
summarize_exploration(repo.list_by_campaign(...)) shape; collapse it
into summarize_campaign_exploration so the aggregation has one home.
Ticket 05 asks the judge review conclusions to flow into the report
verbatim; the aggregation silently dropped good/acceptable dimensions.
Collect every finding sorted poor-first and color drawer tags by rating.
Exploration sessions aggregate into a single exploration summary
(session counts, goal-achievement rate, issue lists from experience
records, judge conclusions when reviewed) that feeds three exits:
the campaign report gains an exploration dimension, the v0.7 analysis
stage-two input gains the summary (stats only, never full dialogues),
and the Markdown export appends a findings appendix after analysis and
comparison. With no exploration data every output stays unchanged.
